The federal court recently announced a judicial review proposed by Chinese immigrants. The Immigration Bureau was issued a departing order by the Immigration Bureau for not meeting the residence requirements multiple times and covering up the fact that the authorities lived their lives. The woman then appealed on the grounds that she needed to accompany her two sons for judicial review, but was eventually rejected by the federal court and advised her to return to China to continue studying with her two sons.

Documents from the Ministry of Immigration show that at the end of 2006, the husband of a Chinese woman obtained immigration qualification through the Quebec Investment Immigration Program. She and her two sons, currently 17 and 13 years old, have been granted permanent resident status as relatives. However, the family of four landed in Canada for the first time. After 10 days of residence, the entire family returned to China. In the next few years, the four people traveled intermittently between China and Canada and lived in Canada for a short time.

In 2011, the woman and her two sons had their maple leaf cards expired, so they filed for renewal applications. Knowing that the stay time does not meet the card's replacement requirements, the woman went to an immigration consulting company to seek documents. The company later sued for multiple fraud and fraud cases. The company's head admitted to the court that it was involved in the fraud charge. But despite the visit of the company by Chinese women, she did not submit any false documents to the immigration department, so she was not affected.

The Immigration Department Appeals Department asked a Chinese woman that she did not live in Canada for a total of 837 days between 2006 and 2011. However, the immigration department found through entry and exit records that she did not reside in Canada for 1,332 days, but the immigration department eventually issued an updated maple leaf card to her and her two sons.

The woman and her two sons later returned to Canada in 2014, while her husband gave up his permanent resident status. When Chinese women entered the country from the United States in April 2016, she told border service officials that she had left Canada for no more than 730 days between 2011 and 2016, but in May, the immigration department found she had left Canada for 1,261 days. Since she was suspected of deliberately covering up her residence duration when she updated her maple leaf card in 2011, the immigration department asked her to ask about the number of days she lived.

The woman tried to seek human reasons during the issue, saying she needed to stay in Canada to take care of her two studying sons, but was rejected by the immigration department and issued a departing order to her. The Chinese woman then appealed to the immigration department but was denied and she continued to file a judicial review in the federal court.

Federal Court Judge Henry S. Brown announced the verdict to uphold the appeals department's judgment and rejected the judicial review application for Chinese women.

The judge emphasized in his judgment that if the repatriation or departure order is to be overturned from a humane perspective, strong reasons must be provided to convince the courts and law enforcement. The Chinese woman said two underage sons have been studying in Canada for a long time. If she leaves, her son will be left unattended. However, the court held that the two sons had no close ties to Canada but had lived in China for a long time. His family is very wealthy, owning a $8 million luxury home in West Vancouver, the family owns $10 million in capital. He has such a family background and is able to support his two sons in attending China International School, which is mainly English.

(Canada)